• BECOME A MEMBER
  • MEMBER LOGIN
  • ABOUT GEOPOLITICS & EMPIRE
  • PODCAST
  • ANALYSIS
  • DONATE / SUPPORT
  • CONSULTATION
  • SPONSORS

The Geopolitics & Empire Newsletter

Get the week's news headlines and a notification for every podcast.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!

What's Hot

John Perkins: China & West Are Both Creating Death Economy Using Hit Man Model

March 24, 2023

Bosnia: The Next Hotspot in Europe?

March 23, 2023

Col. Grant Newsham: War With China a Real Possibility, But Political Warfare is Preferred

March 21, 2023

Facebook Twitter Instagram
Twitter Telegram SoundCloud Apple YouTube Odysee BitChute Gab LinkedIn RSS
Geopolitics & Empire
BECOME A MEMBER MEMBER LOGIN
  • ABOUT
    • ABOUT GEOPOLITICS & EMPIRE
    • GEOPOLITICS & EMPIRE PODCAST REVIEWS
    • AUTHORS
    • CONTACT
    • MEDIA APPEARANCES
    • BOOK REVIEWS BY GEOPOLITICS & EMPIRE
    • FAQ
  • PODCAST

    John Perkins: China & West Are Both Creating Death Economy Using Hit Man Model

    March 24, 2023

    Col. Grant Newsham: War With China a Real Possibility, But Political Warfare is Preferred

    March 21, 2023

    Charlie Robinson: Life After Collapse of American Empire

    March 16, 2023

    Vladimir Kozin: Western & Eastern Blocs Fast Approaching Third World War

    March 11, 2023

    Hügo Krüger: Ukraine, Iran, Nuclear Fallout, & How I Learned to Love the Algorithm Ghetto

    March 9, 2023
  • ANALYSIS

    Bosnia: The Next Hotspot in Europe?

    March 23, 2023

    Was The Collapse of SVB Deliberately Orchestrated?

    March 18, 2023

    Will Vladimir Putin Stand Trial in The Hague?

    March 17, 2023

    Has China Shaken Up the Geopolitical Arena by Facilitating Iran’s & Saudi Arabia’s Normalization of Diplomatic Relations?

    March 14, 2023

    Once a Great Power, Russia is Now Dependent on Iranian Weapons

    March 12, 2023
  • DONATE/SUPPORT
  • CONSULTATION
  • SPONSORS
Geopolitics & Empire
Home»Analysis»Ukraine War: What Comes After Russia’s Kherson Debacle?
Analysis

Ukraine War: What Comes After Russia’s Kherson Debacle?

Nikola MikovicBy Nikola MikovicNovember 12, 2022No Comments4 Mins Read
Twitter Telegram LinkedIn Facebook Email
Share
Twitter Telegram LinkedIn Facebook Email

Russia continues suffering defeat and humiliation in Ukraine. Even though the Kremlin declared partial mobilization on September 21, and reportedly deployed a significant number of new troops to the Eastern European country, Russian Armed Forces did not even attempt to defend Kherson – a city that, from the Russian perspective, is an integral part of Russia.

Instead, since mid-October, Moscow has been gradually preparing its population for Russia’s withdrawal from the strategically important city. As a result of Russian retreat, the entire left bank of the Dniepr River, as well as parts of northern Crimea, will now be within the range of the Ukrainian artillery. There is no doubt that the Ukrainian army will mercilessly shell Russian positions in the region, forcing the Russians to retreat all the way to Crimea.

Since the Kremlin made a precedent by abandoning what it sees as Russian territory, there is no guarantee that Moscow will not continue implementing such a “goodwill gesture” policy, allegedly hoping to convince Kiev and the West to start negotiations. But Ukraine has clearly stated that it does not plan to negotiate with the Kremlin until Russian troops completely withdraw from the former Soviet republic, including Crimea. Indeed, under the current circumstances, following Russia’s debacle in Kharkov and Kherson, Kiev has no reason to hold any talks with Moscow.

The Kremlin, on the other hand, desperately wants to negotiate with the Russian enemy. Quite aware that Russia’s military and political positions are much weaker than they were eight months ago, the Western-backed Ukraine continues indirectly demanding Moscow to make new concessions to Kiev. Yurii Vaskov, Ukraine’s Deputy Minister of Infrastructure has recently proposed to Turkey and the United Nations to extend the grain deal for at least a year, and also to include the ports in the Nikolaev region into a new arrangement between Kiev, Ankara, Moscow and the UN. The Kremlin seems to be ready to make another “goodwill gesture” and allow its opponent to freely export its grain, and potentially receive weapons via the Black Sea.

Thus, the Kherson debacle is neither the first nor the last Russian humiliating defeat in Ukraine. Ever since Russia withdrew its troops from around Kiev as part of the Istanbul deal, it became obvious that the Kremlin never seriously intended to achieve any of initials goals of its so-called special military operation. Meanwhile, those goals have become very fluid, just like Russia’s borders. Now Moscow insists that its primary objective in Ukraine is “to protect the Donbass”, even though it clearly demonstrated that it is unable, or unwilling to protect Donetsk from Ukrainian shelling. Therefore, people living in the Donbass, as well as in other Ukrainian regions that Russia recently annexed, cannot be sure that Russia is there “forever”.

That, however, will not prevent pro-Kremlin propagandists, bots and trolls to continue justifying Russian withdrawals – as they have been doing since April when Russia withdrew from Kiev – and portraying them as “brilliant strategic moves” by the corrupt Russian General Sergey Surovikin. In reality, Russia’s withdrawal from Kherson will undoubtedly have a huge impact on the morale of the Russian troops. It remains rather questionable if Surovikin will manage to continue implanting the Kremlin’s “goodwill gesture” policy in such a way that does not lead to the total collapse of the Russian Armed Forces.

It is becoming crystal clear that the Kremlin, unlike Kiev, is not fighting for victory, but that the Russian leadership seeks to find a way to end the Ukraine adventure in such a way that would allow President Vladimir Putin to save face. That is why Surovikin and Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu, rather than Putin, played major roles explaining in front of TV cameras why Russia had to leave Kherson. Policy makers in Russia aim to portray Putin as a “good tsar” who is apparently not aware of what his “bad boyars” are doing.

Although the Kremlin will continue selling such a narrative to the Russian audience for the foreseeable future, sooner or later the level of apathy in the Russian society will reach its peak. Tired of endless defeats, “goodwill gestures” and lucrative deals with Ukraine and the West, certain structures within the Russian elite will likely attempt to force a “palace coup” and remove Putin from power. The West, however, will likely make sure the Russian leader stays in the Kremlin until the end of the war.

Indeed, as long as Putin, his oligarchs and corrupt bureaucratic officials continue pulling the strings in the Kremlin, Russia will have zero chances to win the war.

Russia Ukraine
Share. Twitter Telegram LinkedIn Facebook Email
Previous ArticleWill Vietnam Join the United States’ Anti-China Coalition?
Next Article Has the Geopolitical Balance in Latin America been Fundamentally Altered?
Nikola Mikovic
  • Website
  • Twitter

Nikola Mikovic is a freelance journalist, researcher and analyst based in Serbia. His work focuses mostly on the foreign policies of Russia, Belarus and Ukraine. His area of focus is the ongoing conflict in the Donbass, as well as relations between Russia and former Soviet republics. Nikola also covers Russia's involvement in Syria and Libya. He writes for several publications such as Diplomatic Courier, Asia Times, CGTN, Tsarizm, Global Comment, among others.

Related Posts

John Perkins: China & West Are Both Creating Death Economy Using Hit Man Model

March 24, 2023

Bosnia: The Next Hotspot in Europe?

March 23, 2023

Col. Grant Newsham: War With China a Real Possibility, But Political Warfare is Preferred

March 21, 2023

Was The Collapse of SVB Deliberately Orchestrated?

March 18, 2023

Comments are closed.

The Geopolitics & Empire Newsletter

Get the week's news headlines and a notification for every podcast.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!

Social Media
  • Twitter
  • Telegram
  • Soundcloud
  • Apple
  • YouTube
  • Odysee
  • BitChute
  • Rumble
  • Gab
  • MeWe
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
Recent Posts
Podcast

John Perkins: China & West Are Both Creating Death Economy Using Hit Man Model

By Geopolitics & EmpireMarch 24, 20230

Economic Hit Man (EHM) John Perkins discusses his new book and how the Chinese have…

Bosnia: The Next Hotspot in Europe?

March 23, 2023

Col. Grant Newsham: War With China a Real Possibility, But Political Warfare is Preferred

March 21, 2023

Was The Collapse of SVB Deliberately Orchestrated?

March 18, 2023

About
About

The Geopolitics & Empire Podcast conducts interviews with prominent international experts on a wide-range of topics. The broadcast seeks to gain insight from guests who come from the left, right, and beyond. The host does not always agree with beliefs espoused by podcast invitees, but maintains an open mind, and believes it important to respectfully listen to a multitude of voices and let listeners come to their own conclusions.

Top Headlines

John Perkins: China & West Are Both Creating Death Economy Using Hit Man Model

March 24, 2023

Bosnia: The Next Hotspot in Europe?

March 23, 2023

Col. Grant Newsham: War With China a Real Possibility, But Political Warfare is Preferred

March 21, 2023
Site Map
  • About Geopolitics & Empire
  • Geopolitics & Empire Podcast Reviews
  • Podcast
  • Analysis
  • Donate / Support
  • Consultation
  • Become a Member
  • Sponsors
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
Twitter Telegram SoundCloud Apple Spotify YouTube Odysee Rokfin Rumble BitChute Brighteon VK Gab MeWe Minds Flote LinkedIn Facebook Instagram RSS
© 2023 Geopolitics & Empire.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?